Comparison
Concrete Pavers vs Porcelain Pavers
Porcelain pavers are dense, stain resistant and dimensionally precise, but thin, brittle at edges and largely limited to pedestrian and pedestal-set use. Concrete pavers come in load-rated thicknesses, work under vehicles, cost less, and offer matched coping, step and wall units.
Concrete pavers
- —Vehicular thicknesses available
- —Lower cost per square foot
- —Matched coping, steps and walls
- —Sand-set or pedestal-set
Porcelain pavers
- —Very low absorption and high stain resistance
- —Precise, thin profile
- —Brittle edges, careful handling and cutting
- —Mainly pedestrian and pedestal applications
Side by side
| Criterion | Concrete pavers | Porcelain pavers |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicular use | Yes | Generally no |
| Cost | Lower | Higher |
| Stain resistance | Good; sealer optional | Excellent |
| Cutting and handling | Standard tooling | Specialty blades, chip risk |
The verdict
Specify porcelain for stain-critical pedestrian terraces and pedestal decks. Specify concrete pavers when loads, budget, matched accessories or a large field are involved.
Frequently asked
- Are porcelain pavers stronger than concrete pavers?
- They are denser but more brittle. Under vehicle and impact loads, thicker concrete units perform better.